There were a number of things that worked well, and a few things that didn't. Serendipitously my army was composed entirely of shooting units, so once the assault started - pretty early, Jim wasn't for sitting and building siege engines - the balance of power was with the defenders.
Takeaways from the playtest:
- This is probably as small a siege as you'd want to play. Both in terms of the size of the defences and the size of the armies. In this format, there were not a lot of strategic options open to me as the defender once the assault was under way.
- As the defender, the defences need to provide more defence!
- On a related note, palisades are probably too susceptible to enemy melee attacks meaning there is less onus on the attacker to build siege machinery.
- There is an ambiguity currently around defenders on top of defences when there are enemies outside at the foot and whether that locks them in melee. There seemed to be pretty clear-cut answers, until the attacker was a giant archangel...
No comments:
Post a Comment